Yes i agree marketing today is mostly lies & false advertising unfortunately has been for a long long time…. raise your awareness —- stop listening to bs lol ? ???️ ?
I am not calling for any violent actions in this post, Peaceful actions can win freedom. Most people that want to wake other people up usually go down a road of over researching with internet videos and their best form of outreach is commenting on the internet, I have been down that road myself. But as a lot of us know, we eventually give up because we do not see our efforts lead to anything productive happening from our comments. Being in a organization can give you encouragement, When you start feeling hopeless alone you only have yourself to talk you out of it and only your efforts to give you hope. But in a organization you see the work of other people and you can get better ideas from them you would have not thought about by yourself.
And I know I will get comments about how most people are sheep and that sheep are impossible to wake up. But there is one thing that you don't understand is that instead of you meeting people that represent the average person you probably meant a few people and then the emotional event of them disrespecting you caused you to overestimate their numbers. This will happen if you talk to randomly anyone, What you do is talk to the people who are most likely to be persuaded to your position first and you avoid the people who are more likely to disrespect you. If you break down which people are more likely to be persuaded by your organization by occupation, political affiliation and many other things you seek those people out first and start a conversation, and then you can test the waters for a moment and if they are the people who will listen to you, you then try to be persuasive and tell the truth to them. If they are reluctant you can pay them to watch awakening videos.
When your organization gets bigger you need to look as good to the people as possible, lets think about this, you have a organization called "truth and freedom organization" if you materially help the people they will think good of you and they will be more receptive to hearing about you then they were before you materially helped them. I think the people who care about people the most should be doing the charity work because not everyone in the organization will give off a vibe that they care and less people will assume that the help is self serving.
The final goal of the organization should be mass protests and massive amounts of people refusing to work for the elites in particular, if nobody works for them, they lose their massive bank accounts that use to dominate society.
And one toxic mindset that keeps people from being more active is the idea "Anyone who can't see it now, will never be able to see it" that is a mindset born from people not knowing how mass paradigm shifts work. Think back to all the times you had your mind changed, it took many times to change your mind. It is the same way with the broad masses of people who you can activate to change society. Thinking the broad masses of people should change their mind after they hear your side's argument once or twice is like expecting you to change your mind instantly when a new opinion is stated to you.
Look up "persuasive tactics" on youtube so you can find out how to persuade people. You might not be able to persuade people but you can still materially support a organization or do logistical work for a origination.
Your trying to sell the idea that were all being manipulated and its bad but it's sometimes okay when it's targeted to serve specific special cases. Ya but no.
Your internet life is 100% aimed towards you. Everything you do with your phone and other internet devices are monitored and aimed to keep you watching, spending, and doing
We, as humans, are so "programmable"… Never thought of it until now… Our bodies basically run on electricity and we have built-in cameras microphones and speakers… The human brain is the most highly technological "part" that has "unlimited" figuring, problem solving and creative capabilities… And even has an "unlimited" memory bank. What makes us different from the latest high-tech robot? It's not that we can reproduce… Robots can build other robots… Its that we are able to love and have compassion for one another… Although humans can obviously be programmed just like robots… We humans already have something in our programming from the very beginning… It's just there… Automatically… We have a genuine love for our creator… And a longing to be "as one" with him… Of course that gets distorted with all the worldly distractions… Almost seems that all this manipulating causes just that… Our separation from our creator ? hmmm…, I forgot where I was going with all of this… Almost as if something took over what I was writing… Anyway, hope everyone has a great day ?
I'm so glad I am freeing myself each day more. It seems like there is always something new to discover, something you never thought about like shampoo sunscreen and makeup, if you would be aware of all the ingredients you wouldn't use them but we learned not to think for ourselves, we think we do;), in the NL we always say we are so free, I don't feel that way, we have the illusion we are because we can vote etcetera but it's all a show, giving you the dilusion you have a choice even the buttons for the stop signs aren't real? I just think some county's have a bigger cage then other parts of the world but you are never really free if you don't become aware/wake up
Manipulated votes. You said it too. Lol. Good clarification. I knew it. However manipulation is not good when it consists in injuries and harm or distortion of the mind, body spirit.
We know it. Sunday, May 30, 2021 Bioethics of Experimental COVID Vaccine Deployment under EUA: It’s time we stop and look at what’s going down. Please share this………….
TrialSiteNews oped
By Robert W Malone, MD, MS
I provide this brief essay for the TrialSite community because you are involved or at least interested in human subjects clinical research. Before examining the bioethical foundations of current policy and practice which underpin experimental COVID vaccine deployment in many in many western nations, allow me to begin by sharing some “real world” first-hand evidence.
I was on a call with a Canadian primary care physician last night for a couple of hours. He related the story of the six (in his mind) highly unusual clinical cases of post-vaccination adverse events that he has personally observed in his practice involving the vaccination of his patients with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine product. Keep in mind that it was Canadian physicians – acting of their own accord – who filed the FOIA to gain access to the Pfizer vaccine IND (see here).
What was most alarming was that my clinical primary practice physician colleague told me that each of these cases were reported as per the proper channels in Canada, and each was summarily determined to not be vaccine-related by the authorities without significant investigation. Furthermore, he reported to me that any practicing physician in Canada who goes public with concerns about vaccine safety is subjected to a storm of derision from academic physicians and potential termination of employment (state-controlled socialized medicine) and loss of license to practice.
This is the face of censorship in the time of COVID. My question is, what are official public health leaders so afraid of? Let’s analyze the vaccine-related adverse event data rigorously. Is there information or patterns that can be found? We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should – no, must – be made available to the public promptly. Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me.
I suggest for your consideration that adult citizens are not children to be dictated to by paternalistic public health authorities. They must be allowed free will, the freedom to choose. These products remain experimental vaccines at this time. Furthermore, we are supposed to be doing rigorous, fact-based science and medicine. If the rigorous and transparent evaluation of vaccine reactogenicity and treatment-emergent post-vaccination adverse events is not done, we (the public health, clinical research, and vaccine developer communities) play right into the hands of anti-vaxxer memes and validate many of their arguments. Thesuppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. And the adult public can handle information and open discussion. They are grown-ups. They should not be treated like children.
In this context, the adult public is basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial. And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents.
The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects. The human subjects – you, me, and the citizens of these countries – MUST be informed of risks. And as a community, we have already had this discussion and made our decision – we cannot compel prisoners, military recruits, or any other population of humans to participate in a clinical research study. For example, see here.
To my eyes, in many regions, public health leadership has stepped over the line and is now violating the bedrock principles which form the foundation upon which the ethics of clinical research are built. I believe that this must stop. Now. We must have transparent public disclosure of risks – in a broad sense – associated with these experimental vaccines. It is either that or the entire modern bioethical structure which supports human subjects research will have to be re-thought.
Furthermore, as these vaccines are not yet market authorized (licensed), coercion of human subjects to participate in medical experimentation is specifically forbidden. Therefore, public health policies that meet generally accepted criteria for coercion to participate in clinical research are forbidden.
For example, if I were to propose a clinical trial involving children and entice participation by giving out ice cream to those willing to participate, any institutional human subjects safety board (IRB) in the country would reject that protocol. If I were to propose a clinical research protocol wherein the population of a geographic region would lose personal liberties unless 70% of the population participated in my study, once again, that protocol would be rejected by any IRB based on coercion of subject participation. No coercion to participate in the study. In human subjects clinical research, in most countries of the world, this is considered a bright line that cannot be crossed. So, now we are told to wave that requirement without even so much as open public discussion being allowed?
In conclusion, I hope that you will join me; stop to take a moment and consider for yourself what is going on. The logic seems clear to me.
1) An unlicensed medical product deployed under emergency use authorization (EUA) remains an experimental product under clinical research development.
2) EUA authorized by national authorities basically grants a short-term right to administer the research product to human subjects without written informed consent.
3) The Geneva Convention, the Helsinki declaration, and the entire structure which supports ethical human subjects research requires that research subjects be fully informed of risks and must consent to participation without coercion.
Has that bright line been crossed? If so, what actions are to be taken? I look forward to learning from your thoughts and conclusions.
The line has been crossed so often it's been completely obliterated by the immoral actions of public health officials, politicians and others!
What do you think?
From earlier:
Canada’s Covid Vaccine Weekly Death and Injury Report- 76 Dead w Vaccine, Worsened Data Lag Continues As bad as the Canadian data is week after week, it's probably much worse.
Manipulation is manipulation. You can’t say one type is good and one type is bad. This video supports an agenda. I don’t agree with it. The best remedy for any type of manipulation is knowing yourself, being comfortable with yourself, and educating yourself and your children. Critical thinking. This video itself was manipulative.
Here is one to consider: has anyone ever noticed the background of the news? both TV and radio. A soft tone backed by binaural rhitms. This is meant to shift your brainwaves towards the theta-frequency. The susceptible state of mind. Manipulation in the area where we should be using our critical thinking.
Wonder why they took it down so quickly
This is taught in business marketing.. Yet, ppl still want the diploma to bs others..
And yes, i walked out after 2yrs.. Cos to manipulate anothers wants & needs is a crime unpunished by man.. Karma will be the judge..
Powerful
This God’s number 111 that I saw in the area
Yes i agree marketing today is mostly lies & false advertising unfortunately has been for a long long time….
raise your awareness —- stop listening to bs lol ? ???️ ?
I am not calling for any violent actions in this post, Peaceful actions can win freedom. Most people that want to wake other people up usually go down a road of over researching with internet videos and their best form of outreach is commenting on the internet, I have been down that road myself. But as a lot of us know, we eventually give up because we do not see our efforts lead to anything productive happening from our comments. Being in a organization can give you encouragement, When you start feeling hopeless alone you only have yourself to talk you out of it and only your efforts to give you hope. But in a organization you see the work of other people and you can get better ideas from them you would have not thought about by yourself.
And I know I will get comments about how most people are sheep and that sheep are impossible to wake up. But there is one thing that you don't understand is that instead of you meeting people that represent the average person you probably meant a few people and then the emotional event of them disrespecting you caused you to overestimate their numbers. This will happen if you talk to randomly anyone, What you do is talk to the people who are most likely to be persuaded to your position first and you avoid the people who are more likely to disrespect you. If you break down which people are more likely to be persuaded by your organization by occupation, political affiliation and many other things you seek those people out first and start a conversation, and then you can test the waters for a moment and if they are the people who will listen to you, you then try to be persuasive and tell the truth to them. If they are reluctant you can pay them to watch awakening videos.
When your organization gets bigger you need to look as good to the people as possible, lets think about this, you have a organization called "truth and freedom organization" if you materially help the people they will think good of you and they will be more receptive to hearing about you then they were before you materially helped them. I think the people who care about people the most should be doing the charity work because not everyone in the organization will give off a vibe that they care and less people will assume that the help is self serving.
The final goal of the organization should be mass protests and massive amounts of people refusing to work for the elites in particular, if nobody works for them, they lose their massive bank accounts that use to dominate society.
And one toxic mindset that keeps people from being more active is the idea "Anyone who can't see it now, will never be able to see it" that is a mindset born from people not knowing how mass paradigm shifts work. Think back to all the times you had your mind changed, it took many times to change your mind. It is the same way with the broad masses of people who you can activate to change society. Thinking the broad masses of people should change their mind after they hear your side's argument once or twice is like expecting you to change your mind instantly when a new opinion is stated to you.
Look up "persuasive tactics" on youtube so you can find out how to persuade people. You might not be able to persuade people but you can still materially support a organization or do logistical work for a origination.
Your trying to sell the idea that were all being manipulated and its bad but it's sometimes okay when it's targeted to serve specific special cases. Ya but no.
I pay attention to everything.
Maybe we should ban their ability to target us through data collection. If we are this gullible, end it!!
Your internet life is 100% aimed towards you. Everything you do with your phone and other internet devices are monitored and aimed to keep you watching, spending, and doing
We, as humans, are so "programmable"… Never thought of it until now… Our bodies basically run on electricity and we have built-in cameras microphones and speakers… The human brain is the most highly technological "part" that has "unlimited" figuring, problem solving and creative capabilities… And even has an "unlimited" memory bank. What makes us different from the latest high-tech robot? It's not that we can reproduce… Robots can build other robots… Its that we are able to love and have compassion for one another… Although humans can obviously be programmed just like robots… We humans already have something in our programming from the very beginning… It's just there… Automatically… We have a genuine love for our creator… And a longing to be "as one" with him… Of course that gets distorted with all the worldly distractions… Almost seems that all this manipulating causes just that… Our separation from our creator ? hmmm…, I forgot where I was going with all of this… Almost as if something took over what I was writing… Anyway, hope everyone has a great day ?
Manipulation is never ok!
This has gone on for centuries well before modern communications. Manipulation has been ongoing since the dawn of man.
Reminds me of the first advertisement… Also remembering the covid advertisement with the calming pastel colors and the mesmerizing music.
I'm so glad I am freeing myself each day more. It seems like there is always something new to discover, something you never thought about like shampoo sunscreen and makeup, if you would be aware of all the ingredients you wouldn't use them but we learned not to think for ourselves, we think we do;), in the NL we always say we are so free, I don't feel that way, we have the illusion we are because we can vote etcetera but it's all a show, giving you the dilusion you have a choice even the buttons for the stop signs aren't real? I just think some county's have a bigger cage then other parts of the world but you are never really free if you don't become aware/wake up
"It's okay to manipulate people if it's for the greater good" wow did you really just say that… manipulation is controlling and psychopathic.
Wow, eyes shot and opened mind!
So are the planetary systems in a enforced manner. Not good whatsoever. Never.
Manipulated votes. You said it too. Lol. Good clarification. I knew it. However manipulation is not good when it consists in injuries and harm or distortion of the mind, body spirit.
The day you become a political atheist and you stop buying into the bullshit left/right game is the day your freedom really begins.
We know it.
Sunday, May 30, 2021
Bioethics of Experimental COVID Vaccine Deployment under EUA: It’s time we stop and look at what’s going down.
Please share this………….
TrialSiteNews oped
By Robert W Malone, MD, MS
I provide this brief essay for the TrialSite community because you are involved or at least interested in human subjects clinical research. Before examining the bioethical foundations of current policy and practice which underpin experimental COVID vaccine deployment in many in many western nations, allow me to begin by sharing some “real world” first-hand evidence.
I was on a call with a Canadian primary care physician last night for a couple of hours. He related the story of the six (in his mind) highly unusual clinical cases of post-vaccination adverse events that he has personally observed in his practice involving the vaccination of his patients with the Pfizer mRNA vaccine product. Keep in mind that it was Canadian physicians – acting of their own accord – who filed the FOIA to gain access to the Pfizer vaccine IND (see here).
What was most alarming was that my clinical primary practice physician colleague told me that each of these cases were reported as per the proper channels in Canada, and each was summarily determined to not be vaccine-related by the authorities without significant investigation. Furthermore, he reported to me that any practicing physician in Canada who goes public with concerns about vaccine safety is subjected to a storm of derision from academic physicians and potential termination of employment (state-controlled socialized medicine) and loss of license to practice.
This is the face of censorship in the time of COVID. My question is, what are official public health leaders so afraid of? Let’s analyze the vaccine-related adverse event data rigorously. Is there information or patterns that can be found? We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should – no, must – be made available to the public promptly. Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me.
I suggest for your consideration that adult citizens are not children to be dictated to by paternalistic public health authorities. They must be allowed free will, the freedom to choose. These products remain experimental vaccines at this time. Furthermore, we are supposed to be doing rigorous, fact-based science and medicine. If the rigorous and transparent evaluation of vaccine reactogenicity and treatment-emergent post-vaccination adverse events is not done, we (the public health, clinical research, and vaccine developer communities) play right into the hands of anti-vaxxer memes and validate many of their arguments. Thesuppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. And the adult public can handle information and open discussion. They are grown-ups. They should not be treated like children.
In this context, the adult public is basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial. And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents.
The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects. The human subjects – you, me, and the citizens of these countries – MUST be informed of risks. And as a community, we have already had this discussion and made our decision – we cannot compel prisoners, military recruits, or any other population of humans to participate in a clinical research study. For example, see here.
To my eyes, in many regions, public health leadership has stepped over the line and is now violating the bedrock principles which form the foundation upon which the ethics of clinical research are built. I believe that this must stop. Now. We must have transparent public disclosure of risks – in a broad sense – associated with these experimental vaccines. It is either that or the entire modern bioethical structure which supports human subjects research will have to be re-thought.
I really think we need to
“stop, children, what’s that sound – everybody look what’s going down”
(For What it’s Worth, Buffalo Springfield)
Furthermore, as these vaccines are not yet market authorized (licensed), coercion of human subjects to participate in medical experimentation is specifically forbidden. Therefore, public health policies that meet generally accepted criteria for coercion to participate in clinical research are forbidden.
For example, if I were to propose a clinical trial involving children and entice participation by giving out ice cream to those willing to participate, any institutional human subjects safety board (IRB) in the country would reject that protocol. If I were to propose a clinical research protocol wherein the population of a geographic region would lose personal liberties unless 70% of the population participated in my study, once again, that protocol would be rejected by any IRB based on coercion of subject participation. No coercion to participate in the study. In human subjects clinical research, in most countries of the world, this is considered a bright line that cannot be crossed. So, now we are told to wave that requirement without even so much as open public discussion being allowed?
In conclusion, I hope that you will join me; stop to take a moment and consider for yourself what is going on. The logic seems clear to me.
1) An unlicensed medical product deployed under emergency use authorization (EUA) remains an experimental product under clinical research development.
2) EUA authorized by national authorities basically grants a short-term right to administer the research product to human subjects without written informed consent.
3) The Geneva Convention, the Helsinki declaration, and the entire structure which supports ethical human subjects research requires that research subjects be fully informed of risks and must consent to participation without coercion.
Has that bright line been crossed? If so, what actions are to be taken? I look forward to learning from your thoughts and conclusions.
The line has been crossed so often it's been completely obliterated by the immoral actions of public health officials, politicians and others!
What do you think?
From earlier:
Canada’s Covid Vaccine Weekly Death and Injury Report- 76 Dead w Vaccine, Worsened Data Lag Continues
As bad as the Canadian data is week after week, it's probably much worse.
Alkl governments are bent on keeping us behind
There are only 2 genders. Get over it!
Thanks
Manipulation is manipulation. You can’t say one type is good and one type is bad. This video supports an agenda. I don’t agree with it.
The best remedy for any type of manipulation is knowing yourself, being comfortable with yourself, and educating yourself and your children. Critical thinking. This video itself was manipulative.
Edward Bernays. Google it.
What is Victoria's secret ???
Her real name is Victor.
I definitely wanna by an I Am shirt now ? nice manipulating dm.
Here is one to consider: has anyone ever noticed the background of the news? both TV and radio. A soft tone backed by binaural rhitms. This is meant to shift your brainwaves towards the theta-frequency. The susceptible state of mind.
Manipulation in the area where we should be using our critical thinking.
I care not what others think, I believe in Jesus of Nazareth.
social media IS a form of manipulation
youtube manipulates also. your videos including
Vaccination is one of the most absurd manipulations and human rights violations.
I think for me these means human evolution and Civilization and standardization. Well anyways its your channel. Thanks and more power..
Face the fear of terrifying truth and it will never enslave your mind again.